X
Story Stream
recent articles

Waste of the Day: Nevada Court Stops Referendum to Repeal Stadium Funding

June 11, 2024

Topline: Nevada voters would have had a chance to avoid paying for a new Major League Baseball stadium in Las Vegas, but the state’s Supreme Court banned such a referendum from appearing on ballots.

Key facts: The Nevada government last year agreed to provide $380 million of the $1.5 billion needed for the Oakland Athletics to relocate to Las Vegas.

The political action committee Schools Over Stadiums quickly formed to oppose the spending plan, arguing that the money should go toward education, since Nevada ranks 48th in the country in spending per student.

The PAC added a ballot question for this November, asking voters if they wanted to repeal the $380 million finance deal, but a lower court ruled in May that the full context of the question couldn’t be fully explained in 200 words — the maximum length for a referendum question in the state.

Open the Books
Waste of the Day 6.11.24

The Nevada Supreme Court upheld the ruling this May, saying the ballot question is “misleading” and "explains the general effect of a referendum, but it does not describe the practical effects of this specific referendum," according to CBS News. The court said the full 66-page funding bill would need to appear on the ballot, which is impossible under current law.

Schools Over Stadiums says it will attempt to have the referendum go to voters in 2026.

Nevada already provided $750 million for the NFL’s Raiders to move from Oakland to Las Vegas in 2020, which at the time was the highest-ever public investment in a stadium.

Background: Pushback over publicly-financed sports stadiums has reached a new gear this year as price tag records continue to be broken.

From 2020 to 2022, U.S. taxpayers paid $750 million of the $1.97 billion it took to build five new stadiums around the country, bringing the public cost above $30 billion since 1990.

That looks like a bargain today. The new Buffalo Bills stadium will cost taxpayers $850 million, and the Cleveland Browns want their city to chip in $1.2 billion for a new stadium.

Lawmakers and team owners say the tourism boost and job creations offset the cost, but that’s often not the case.

Judith Grant Long, a professor of urban planning at the University of Michigan, told Colorado Newsline that “mounds of peer-reviewed academic research shows that stadium and arena investments cost more than their economic benefits.”

J.C. Bradbury, economics professor at Kennesaw State University, agreed that stadiums are “really poor public investments … without exception.”

It’s not as if stadiums can’t be financed without taxpayer subsidies. Los Angeles Rams owner Stan Kroenke privately raised all $5.5 billion needed to build SoFi Stadium in 2020, the world’s most expensive stadium.

Summary: Even though the legislators funding the Athletics’ stadium were popularly elected, Nevada taxpayers deserve a more direct voice in how their $380 million will be spent.

The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com

This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.
Newsletter Signup