Being a “purple state,” Pennsylvania has more than its share of Democrats who are self-described moderates. And, because they’re Democrats, many in the mainstream media make sure never to refer to them as “progressives” or “left wing” – let alone “extreme.”

But, to paraphrase some old wisdom, if you vote with the left wing of your party almost all the time, and you allow left-wingers to control the legislative agenda, and you never criticize the radicals in your party, then guess what? You’re a left-wing politician.

I’m looking at you, Bob Casey, Chrissy Houlahan, Matt Cartwright, Susan Wild, and Chris DeLuzio. These Pennsylvania members of Congress typify the “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” They are left-wing politicians hiding behind “moderate” imagery. With their monotone rhetoric and generic-politician Facebook posts, a voter might never know these politicians have more in common with progressive activists than families at Chick-fil-A.

What comes to mind when you think of Sen. Casey? He’s from Scranton. Seems likes a regular guy – not like those “left-wing” or “progressive” politicians.

But Casey votes with Sen. Elizabeth Warren 93% of the time, according to vote tracking. I suspect that most Pennsylvanians (and most Massachusetts residents, too) would acknowledge that Warren is pretty far left. Did you know that his last job outside of government was when Bill Clinton was in the White House?

Often the Caseys of this world talk about being “independent” and “bipartisan,” about putting “us” first. Well, if you think that Casey is an “independent” voice, you might be surprised to learn that he supports President Biden’s policies 98.5% of the time, according to vote tracking.

When Casey was running for Senate in 2006, he criticized then-Sen. Rick Santorum for being too supportive of President George W. Bush. “When you have two politicians in Washington that agree 98%  of the time,” Casey said, “one of them is really not necessary.”

What do you say to voters in 2024, Sen. Casey?

As for Casey’s Pennsylvania counterparts in the House, it’s more of the same, if not worse.

Chrissy Houlahan uses all the virtue-signaling words from the “hide the fact that you’re a left-wing politician” script. She talks about having worked in the private sector. Well, yes: she was part owner of a company whose products (sneakers) were made in a Chinese sweatshop.

She talks about being in the bipartisan “problem-solvers” caucus. Ask her to name a bipartisan policy she advanced that solved a problem for taxpayers. Go ahead, ask.

Yet, when you look at her actual voting record, Houlahan votes with Nancy Pelosi 94% of the time. And we all know that Pelosi embodies “moderation,” consensus-building, and bipartisanship, don’t we?

Well, certainly Houlahan’s “I worked in the private sector and belong to the problem-solvers caucus” must have an independent streak. She can’t be as breathlessly loyal to Biden as Casey is – can she? Yes, she can, and worse: 99.1% of the time.

It’s even worse for the fake moderate from the “purple” Lehigh Valley: while Susan Wild equals Houlahan’s support for Pelosi – 94% – she tops Houlahan when it comes to the Biden. Wild has never opposed POTUS – she has given him 100% support.

Matt Cartwright from blue-collar Scranton: you must be thinking, he can’t be like those others. True. He’s worse: 95% with Pelosi, and 100% with Biden.

And Western Pennsylvania’s freshman congressman, Chris Deluzio, comes in at 95% with Pelosi. Deluzio learned the “game” fast.

Each of these politicians – whether Casey or the members of the House – talk the moderate talk yet vote with the left wing. They never hesitate to use all the virtue-signaling words: “independent,” “working across the aisle,” “bipartisan.”

In the end, when the votes are taken, they side with the left, virtually every time.

In a sense, you can admire Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, and AOC. They come right out and tell you that they put ideology first. That “socialism” isn’t a bad thing. That party loyalty is more important than consensus building – or solving problems.

Many of us have more contempt for the others. The “fake moderates.”

We see them on social media, at Chamber of Commerce events and ribbon-cuttings. Their press releases and social media postings are peppered with all the right words. They show up to all the “right” events.

They make us think that they’re “one of us.” Not like those left-wing, partisan politicians – and, please, nothing like those fanatical “ideologues” we see on social media or on “Meet the Press.”

Except they are. In fact, they’re worse.

They don’t have the courage of their convictions – either to admit to us that they are left-wing, or to stand up to their partisan pals.

Ask yourself: When the lockdowns were taking place, did any of these politicians speak out against them? When the De-Fund the Police rallies – and riots – were taking place, did they stand in support of cops, telling the rioters to stop?

Has Casey or any of them spoken out against their party and demanded that our border be secured (as some of their Democratic colleagues in Texas have done)?

Have they ever told the climate zealots that they’ve gone too far? That “banning fossil fuels” is dangerous – and stupid?

Have they demanded an end to men playing women’s sports in college?

Have they ever opposed any of the wasteful spending from Washington, DC?

Did they ever criticize Anthony Fauci?

Their collective silence on the rise of anti-Semitism has been deafening.

In short, can you think of one time that Bob Casey or any of these fake moderates opposed any of the extreme policies coming from their party?

Their silence – and their nearly 100% voting records of support for policies that have caused inflation, $4 gas, increased violent crime, and open borders should tell us all we need to know.